Intracranial ependymoma with extremely rare extraneural metastasis.

Ependymomas account for 1-8% of overall brain tumors. They are most common at the age of 3-4 years. Their metastasis is very rare, and extraneural metastasis is even more unusual. In this report, the ependymoma localized in the posterior fossa with metastasis into femoral diaphysis in a 27-year-old male patient, who was treated in 2001, is presented. As we did not have any other cases of patients having a brain and spinal tumor with extraneural metastases even after 21 years, until 2022, this case was found worthy of being presented. When the literature was examined, it was observed that there is still no standard treatment after surgery for ependymomas and their metastasis. Due to their rarity, the general treatment of extraneural metastasis of ependymomas is also under discussion. It is recommended that clinicians consider admitting patients with rare or hard-to-treat tumors to ongoing clinical trials.

Multimodality Imaging for 3D Printing and Surgical Rehearsal in Complex Spine Surgery.

Surgery is the mainstay treatment of symptomatic spinal tumors. It aids in restoring functionality, managing pain and tumor growth, and improving overall quality of life. Over the past decade, advancements in medical imaging techniques combined with the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology have enabled improvements in the surgical management of spine tumors by significantly increasing the precision, accuracy, and safety of the surgical procedures. For complex spine surgical cases, the use of multimodality imaging is necessary to fully visualize the extent of disease, including both soft-tissue and bone involvement. Integrating the information provided by these examinations in a cohesive manner to facilitate surgical planning can be challenging, particularly when multiple surgical specialties work in concert. The digital 3-dimensional (3D) model or 3D rendering and the 3D printed model created from imaging examinations such as CT and MRI not only facilitate surgical planning but also allow the placement of virtual and physical surgical or osteotomy planes, further enhancing surgical planning and rehearsal. The authors provide practical information about the 3D printing workflow, from image acquisition to postprocessing of a 3D printed model, as well as optimal material selection and incorporation of quality management systems, to help surgeons utilize 3D printing for surgical planning. The authors also highlight the process of surgical rehearsal, how to prescribe digital osteotomy planes, and integration with intraoperative surgical navigation systems through a case-based discussion. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Cervical Symptomatic Hemangiomas and Spinal Metastases: A Case Series and Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a commonly used technique for the treatment of spinal diseases, but it is rarely employed for cervical lesions. This study presents a case series and a literature review to evaluate the efficacy of cervical PVP. METHODS: From August 2013 to January 2023, 14 patients underwent cervical PVP in the author's institution. The mean postoperative follow-up time was 20.3 ± 12.1 months (ranging from 5 to 41 months). The pain status and quality of life were assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, and during follow-up using the Visual Analog Scale and Neck Disability Index. Additionally, complications that occurred during the study period were documented. RESULTS: The series of cases included 9 cases of hemangiomas and 5 cases of spinal metastases. The common symptom was axial pain in the neck. All patients were successfully treated with PVP. Visual analog scale scores decreased from 6.6 ± 0.8 preoperatively to 1.9 ± 0.8 at 24 hours postoperatively and to 2.4 ± 1.2 at the last follow-up (P < 0.01). Neck Disability Index decreased from 22.3% ± 8.9% preoperatively to 7.6% ± 8.1% at 24 hours postoperatively and to 6.0% ± 7.2% at 12-month follow-up (P < 0.01). After the operation, a case of dysphagia occurred, but no major complications were observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical PVP via the anterolateral approach is a safe option for the treatment of cervical symptomatic hemangiomas and spinal metastases with limited invasiveness. It is effective in relieving pain and improving quality of life.

A Novel and Reproducible Classification of Cervical Dumbbell Tumors to Inform Surgical Approach and Reconstruction Techniques.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: This study developed a novel classification system based on imaging and anatomy to select optimal surgical approaches and reconstruction strategies to achieve total resection of cervical dumbbell tumors and restore spinal stability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Total resection is necessary to decrease the recurrence rate of cervical dumbbell tumors. Previous cervical dumbbell tumor classifications are insufficient for determining surgical strategies; therefore, a practical classification is needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 295 consecutive patients with cervical dumbbell tumors who underwent total surgical resection. A novel classification of cervical dumbbell tumors was developed based on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Continuous variables were expressed as mean±SD and were compared using an unpaired two-tailed Student t test. The χ 2 test or the Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables. Kendall's W test assessed three independent raters' inter-rater and intrarater reliabilities on 140 cervical dumbbell tumors. RESULTS: The inter-rater and intrarater consistency coefficient was 0.969 (χ 2 =404.3, P <0.001) and 0.984 (χ 2 =273.7, P <0.001). All patients with type I and II tumors underwent single-posterior surgeries to achieve total resection. Of the patients in this study, 86.1%, 25.9%, 75.9%, and 76.9% underwent posterior surgeries for types IIIa, IIIb, IVa, and V tumors, respectively. All patients with type IVb tumors underwent a combined anterior and posterior approach. Posterior internal fixation was used for all patients in posterior surgery. Anterior reconstruction was applied for patients with type IVb tumors (20/20, 100%) and some with type V tumors (3/13, 23.1%). The mean follow-up duration was 93.6±2.6 months. A recurrence was observed in 19 (6.4%) patients. CONCLUSION: The authors describe a novel classification system that is of practical use for planning the complete resection of cervical dumbbell tumors.

Essentials of Spinal Tumor Ablation.

Recent advances in percutaneous minimally invasive thermal ablation and vertebral augmentation provide radiologists with important arsenal for treatment of selected patients with spinal metastases. These interventions have proven to be safe, effective, and durable in treatment of selected patients with vertebral metastases. Attention to procedure techniques, including choice of ablation modality, vertebral augmentation technique, and thermal protection, is essential for improved patient outcomes. A detailed knowledge of such interventions and implementation of procedural safety measures will further heighten radiologists' role in the management of patients with spinal metastases.

Chronic neck pain in a child: a case of osteoblastoma of the C5 cervical vertebra.

Osteoblastoma is a primary bone-forming tumour that usually occurs in the second decade with an affinity to the posterior elements when found in the spine. Its occurrence in the early first decade is uncommon and often causes a diagnostic dilemma. It usually has a late presentation and the symptoms may be non-specific which may lead the clinician to overlook this particular entity. We present a case of osteoblastoma of the posterior elements of the C5 vertebra in a pre-adolescent child who was diagnosed and successfully managed with surgical resection in a timely fashion that led to favourable recovery postoperatively.

Medullary Compression by a Cervical Osteochondroma in a Patient with Multiple Hereditary Exostoses: A Case Report.

CASE: A 19-year-old man with Multiple Hereditary Exostoses presented with cervical pain without neurological symptoms and/or signs. Magnetic resonance revealed a large C2 osteochondroma, occupying a part of the medullary canal. He was submitted to an en bloc resection with hemilaminectomy without fusion. At the 1-year follow-up, he presented resolution of pain and no neurological symptoms or signs, without cervical instability or radiological signs of disease recurrence. CONCLUSION: Cervical osteochondroma is usually asymptomatic. Neurological compression and differentiation to chondrosarcoma are the main concerns. Surgical excision allows the local cure of the disease and is usually performed without fusion.

Customized 3-dimensional-printed Vertebral Implants for Spinal Reconstruction After Tumor Resection: A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcomes of customized 3-dimensional (3D) printed implants for spinal reconstruction after tumor resection. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Various techniques exist for spinal reconstruction after tumor resection. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the utility of customized 3D-printed implants for spinal reconstruction after tumor resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed according to "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" guidelines. All level I-V evidence studies reporting the use of 3D-printed implants for spinal reconstruction after tumor resection were included. RESULTS: Eleven studies (65 patients; mean age, 40.9 ± 18.1 y) were included. Eleven patients (16.9%) underwent intralesional resections with positive margins and 54 patients (83.1%) underwent en bloc spondylectomy with negative margins. All patients underwent vertebral reconstruction with 3D-printed titanium implants. Tumor involvement was in the cervical spine in 21 patients (32.3%), thoracic spine in 29 patients (44.6%), thoracolumbar junction in 2 patients (3.1%), and lumbar spine in 13 patients (20.0%). Ten studies with 62 patients reported perioperative outcomes radiologic/oncologic status at final follow-up. At the mean final follow-up of 18.5 ± 9.8 months, 47 patients (75.8%) had no evidence of disease, 9 patients (14.5%) were alive with recurrence, and 6 patients (9.7%) had died of disease. One patient who underwent C3-C5 en bloc spondylectomy had an asymptomatic subsidence of 2.7 mm at the final follow-up. Twenty patients that underwent thoracic and/or lumbar reconstruction had a mean subsidence of 3.8 ± 4.7 mm at the final follow-up; however, only 1 patient had a symptomatic subsidence that required revision surgery. Eleven patients (17.7%) had one or more major complications. CONCLUSION: There is some evidence to suggest that using customized 3D-printed titanium or titanium alloy implants is an effective technique for spinal reconstruction after tumor resection. There is a high incidence of asymptomatic subsidence and major complications that are similar to other methods of reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, systematic review of level I-V studies.

Comparison of Hounsfield units and vertebral bone quality score for the prediction of time to pathologic fracture in mobile spine metastases treated with radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Spine metastases are commonly treated with radiotherapy for local tumor control; pathologic fracture is a potential complication of spinal radiotherapy. Both Hounsfield units (HUs) on CT and vertebral bone quality (VBQ) on MRI have been argued to predict stability as measured by odds of pathologic fracture, although it is unclear if there is a difference in the predictive power between the two methodologies. The objective of the present study was to examine whether one methodology is a better predictor of pathologic fracture following radiotherapy for mobile spine metastases. METHODS: Patients who underwent radiotherapy (conventional external-beam radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, or intensity-modulated radiation therapy) for mobile spine (C1-L5) metastases at a tertiary care center were retrospectively identified. Details regarding underlying pathology, patient demographics, and tumor morphology were collected. Vertebral involvement was assessed using the Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini (WBB) system. Bone quality of the non-tumor-involved bone was assessed on both pretreatment CT and MRI. Univariable analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of fracture, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to identify significant predictors of time to pathologic fracture. Stepwise Cox regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of time to fracture. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included (mean age 62.7 ± 11.9 years; 61% male), of whom 35 experienced postradiotherapy pathologic fractures. The most common histologies were lung (22%), prostate (21%), breast (14%), and renal cell (13%). On univariable analysis, the mean HUs of the vertebrae adjacent to the fractured vertebra were significantly lower among those experiencing fracture; VBQ was not significantly associated with fracture odds. Survival analysis showed that average HUs ≤ 132, nonprostate pathology, involvement of ≥ 3 vertebral body segments on the WBB system, Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) ≥ 7, and the presence of axial pain all predicted increased odds of fracture (all p < 0.001). Cox regression found that HUs ≤ 132 (OR 2.533, 95% CI 1.257-5.103; p = 0.009), ≥ 3 WBB vertebral body segments involved (OR 2.376, 95% CI 1.132-4.987; p = 0.022), and axial pain (OR 2.036, 95% CI 0.916-4.526; p = 0.081) predicted increased fracture odds, while prostate pathology predicted decreased odds (OR 0.076, 95% CI 0.009-0.613; p = 0.016). Sensitivity analysis suggested that an HU threshold of ≤ 132 and a SINS of ≥ 7 identified patients at increased risk of fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that bone density surrogates as measured on CT, but not MRI, can be used to predict the risk of pathologic fracture following radiotherapy for mobile spine metastases. More extensive vertebral body involvement and the presence of mechanical axial pain additionally predict increased fracture odds.

A New Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting Spinal Metastases on Computed Tomography Images.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective diagnostic study. OBJECTIVE: To automatically detect osteolytic bone metastasis lesions in the thoracolumbar region using conventional computed tomography (CT) scans, we developed a new deep learning (DL)-based computer-aided detection model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Radiographic detection of bone metastasis is often difficult, even for orthopedic surgeons and diagnostic radiologists, with a consequent risk for pathologic fracture or spinal cord injury. If we can improve detection rates, we will be able to prevent the deterioration of patients' quality of life at the end stage of cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included CT scans acquired at Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU) Hospital between 2016 and 2022. A total of 263 positive CT scans that included at least one osteolytic bone metastasis lesion in the thoracolumbar spine and 172 negative CT scans without bone metastasis were collected for the datasets to train and validate the DL algorithm. As a test data set, 20 positive and 20 negative CT scans were separately collected from the training and validation datasets. To evaluate the performance of the established artificial intelligence (AI) model, sensitivity, precision, F1-score, and specificity were calculated. The clinical utility of our AI model was also evaluated through observer studies involving six orthopaedic surgeons and six radiologists. RESULTS: Our AI model showed a sensitivity, precision, and F1-score of 0.78, 0.68, and 0.72 (per slice) and 0.75, 0.36, and 0.48 (per lesion), respectively. The observer studies revealed that our AI model had comparable sensitivity to orthopaedic or radiology experts and improved the sensitivity and F1-score of residents. CONCLUSION: We developed a novel DL-based AI model for detecting osteolytic bone metastases in the thoracolumbar spine. Although further improvement in accuracy is needed, the current AI model may be applied to current clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The role of diffusion-weighted MRI in the accurate diagnosis of vertebral compression fractures: A comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Accurately distinguishing between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures is crucial for clinical management. This study evaluated the predictive accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating the cause of vertebral fractures using MRI. METHODS: A longitudinal cross-over study was conducted at Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC) Karachi from July 2018 to January 2021. Patients with vertebral compression fractures underwent T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and DWI imaging with ADC mapping on a 1.5 T MRI scanner. Imaging findings were compared with histopathologic results and clinical follow-up. Sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curve analyses were performed. RESULTS: The study enrolled 303 patients with a mean age of 43.6 ± 10.9 years, of whom 118 were male. DWI demonstrated high accuracy in predicting the cause of vertebral compression fractures, with a sensitivity of 96.2 %, a specificity of 76.2 %, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.857. The optimal ADC cut-off value was 0.82 × 10˄-3 mm˄2/s, which yielded a positive predictive value of 79.7 % and a negative predictive value of 95.4 %. CONCLUSIONS: DWI is a safe and non-invasive imaging modality with excellent predictive accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. Iso- or hypointensity of collapsed vertebral bodies on DWI suggests a benign lesion, while T2-weighted hyperintensity is highly indicative of malignancy. Low signal on ADC is also highly indicative of malignant vertebral fractures. Incorporating DWI improves accuracy in assessing vertebral lesions, especially when standard sequences are inconclusive. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: DWI revolutionizes vertebral compression fracture diagnosis, distinguishing between benign and malignant cases. This precision guides treatment decisions, minimizing the necessity for invasive procedures like biopsy. As a safe and reliable imaging method, DWI elevates patient care, ensuring accurate diagnostics and improved outcomes.

Pediatric neuroblastoma with intraspinal extension: the role of surgical management.

OBJECTIVE: Neuroblastoma with spinal involvement accounts for up to 30% of pediatric spinal tumors and can cause profound neurological deficits. Chemotherapy is the preferred treatment option, but in select patients resection may be indicated. The goal of this study was to identify preoperative factors that led to early surgical intervention, with a specific emphasis on identifying differences on long-term neurological function and spinal deformity in the recent treatment era. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all children diagnosed with neuroblastoma at a single institution from 2007 to 2020. Patient demographics, symptoms (motor deficit and sphincter dysfunction), and tumor characteristics (e.g., 123I metaiodobenzylguanidine [MIBG] avidity, MYCN amplification, chromosomal abnormality, pathology, catecholamine secretion, and stage) were recorded. Spine involvement included neural or vertebral extension, spinal cord compression, and/or T2 signal change on MRI. Survival, neurological status (motor deficit, sphincter dysfunction), and spine deformity at last follow-up were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. The variables that contributed to neurological and deformity outcome were assessed with binomial logistic and linear regression models using R software. RESULTS: Seventy-seven of the 160 patients with neuroblastoma had spinal neuroblastoma, meaning either bone metastases alone (n = 43) or intraspinal extension with or without neurological deficit (n= 34). Most patients with spinal neuroblastoma were treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (97% and 57%, respectively). Resection of the spinal tumor was performed in 14 (18%) patients, all of whom also received chemotherapy. Between the surgical and nonsurgical patients, no baseline demographic differences were found. However, surgical patients were more likely to present with either motor deficits (50% vs 5%, p = 0.0011) or bladder/bowel dysfunction (14% vs 0%, p 0.035), and a shorter median time to onset of neurological symptoms (33 vs 80 days, p = 0.0096). Surgical patients also had a significantly shorter median overall survival (33.0 vs 54 months, p = 0.014). Of the 14 patients who underwent spine surgery, 2 patients underwent surgery at the time of diagnosis while the remaining 12 underwent initial chemotherapy followed later by resection. The 2 patients who underwent initial surgery had excellent outcomes, with neither long-term motor or bowel/bladder deficits nor spinal deformity. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical patients had shorter overall survival. However, the 2 patients with radiographic evidence of cord compression and acute neurological symptom onset who underwent initial, immediate surgery within 3 days of diagnosis had fewer long-term neurological deficits than surgical patients who underwent initial trials of chemotherapy. Thus, acute decompression may provide benefit in carefully selected patients with acute neurological deficits and cord compression on imaging.

T1-Weighted, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Perfusion Imaging Can Differentiate between Treatment Success and Failure in Spine Metastases Undergoing Radiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Current imaging techniques have difficulty differentiating treatment success and failure in spinal metastases undergoing radiation therapy. This study investigated the correlation between changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging perfusion parameters and clinical outcomes following radiation therapy for spinal metastases. We hypothesized that perfusion parameters will outperform traditional size measurements in discriminating treatment success and failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 49 patients (mean age, 63 [SD, 13] years; 29 men) with metastatic lesions treated with radiation therapy who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. The median time between radiation therapy and follow-up dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging was 62 days. We divided patients into 2 groups: clinical success (n = 38) and failure (n = 11). Failure was defined as PET recurrence (n = 5), biopsy-proved (n = 1) recurrence, or an increase in tumor size (n = 7), while their absence defined clinical success. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to assess differences between groups. RESULTS: The reduction in plasma volume was greater in the success group than in the failure group (-57.3% versus +88.2%, respectively; P < .001). When we assessed the success of treatment, the sensitivity of plasma volume was 91% (10 of 11; 95% CI, 82%-97%) and the specificity was 87% (33 of 38; 95% CI, 73%-94%). The sensitivity of size measurements was 82% (9 of 11; 95% CI, 67%-90%) and the specificity was 47% (18 of 38; 95% CI, 37%-67%). CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of plasma volume was higher than that of conventional size measurements, suggesting that dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging is a powerful tool to discriminate between treatment success and failure.

Surgical treatment of male breast cancer metastasis to thoracic spine: A case report.

PURPOSE: We present a rare clinical case of a metastatic spinal tumor in the 7th thoracic spine from male breast cancer (MBC). METHOD: A 62-year-old man was referred as an outpatient, complaining of continuous pain in the back and right flank that began 2 weeks earlier. The patient had no neurologic signs or symptoms but had a medical history of left breast modified radical mastectomy because of MBC. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed metastasis in the T7 vertebra and no other metastasis on positron emission tomography/computed tomography or bone scan. Separation surgery was performed with posterior corpectomy of T7 (en bloc excision), followed by stabilization with an expandable titanium cage and pedicle screws. The pathological examination of the excised T7 vertebra confirmed metastatic carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation from the breast. Adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy was performed after surgery. RESULTS: The patient had no symptoms at the 21-month follow-up. Radiologic studies showed no evidence of recurrent or metastatic lesions. CONCLUSION: MBC is extremely rare, with fewer cases of spinal metastases. Among these, patients who undergo separation surgery are even rarer. This case shows that radical surgery can be an option for MBC with spine metastasis if indicated.

The new clinical classification of metastatic spinal malignancies serves as a vital reference for surgical management: a retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: It is commonly accepted that surgical treatment is an essential component of the comprehensive management of metastatic spinal malignancies. However, up until now, the clinical classification of metastatic spinal malignancies has not been well-structured. METHODS: After IRB approval, 86 patients with metastatic spinal malignancies were adopted. According to the vascular distribution, stability of vertebrae, and degree of nerve compression, metastatic spinal malignancies can be classified into five types. Tumors classified as type I typically appear in the vertebral body. Type II tumors are those that develop in the transverse processes, superior and inferior articular processes, and spinal pedicles. Type III denotes malignancies that are present in the spinous process and vertebral plate. Types IVa and IVb are included in type IV. Type IVa combines type I and type II, whereas type IVb combines type II and type III. Type V tumors are those of types I, II, and III that co-occur and spread in different directions into the spinal canal. 20 of included 86 patients who did not receive segmental arterial embolization were set as the non-embolization group. The embolization group included 24 patients who received segmental arterial embolization on both sides of the diseased vertebrae. 42 patients were included in the offending embolization group after receiving responsible arterial embolization. A surgical intervention was performed within 24 h following an embolization. Surgical intervention with the purpose of removing as much of the tumor as possible and providing an effective reconstruction of the spinal column. RESULTS: In comparison with the non-embolization group and embolization group, the offending embolization group presented unique advantages in terms of bleeding volume (p<0.001), operation time (p<0.001), and local recurrence rate within 12 months (p=0.006). CONCLUSION: By significantly reducing surgical trauma and local recurrence rate (12 months), responsible arterial vascular embolization procedures together with associated surgical protocols developed on the basis of the clinical classification of metastatic spinal malignancies, are worthy of clinical dissemination.

Diagnóstico por imagen de las metástasis vertebrales / Imaging diagnosis of vertebral metastasis

La columna vertebral es la tercera ubicación más frecuente para la enfermedad metastásica, después del pulmón y el hígado. Por otra parte, los tumores óseos más recurrentes son las metástasis, siendo la columna su principal lugar de localización. En este trabajo se realiza una revisión de las diferentes técnicas de imagen disponibles, tanto radiológicas como de medicina nuclear, y de la apariencia morfológica de las metástasis de columna en cada una de ellas. La resonancia magnética (RM) es la mejor modalidad de imagen para la detección de metástasis en la columna. Es importante efectuar el diagnóstico diferencial entre fractura vertebral de causa osteoporótica y patológica. La compresión medular es una complicación grave de la enfermedad metastásica y su valoración mediante imagen a través de escalas objetivas es determinante para la estimación de la estabilidad de la columna y, por consiguiente, para establecer el tratamiento. Por último, se comentan brevemente las técnicas de intervencionismo percutáneo.(AU)

The spine is the third most frequent location for metastatic disease, after the lung and liver. On the other hand, the most frequent bone tumors are metastases and the spine is the main location. A review of the different imaging techniques available, both radiological and nuclear medicine, and the morphological appearance of spinal metastases in each of them is performed. Magnetic resonance imaging is the best imaging modality for detection of spinal metastases. It is important to make the differential diagnosis between vertebral fracture of osteoporotic and pathological cause. Spinal cord compression is a serious complication of metastatic disease and its assessment by imaging through objective scales is decisive for estimating spinal stability and therefore establishing treatment. Lastly, percutaneous intervention techniques are briefly discussed.(AU)

[Translated article] Imaging diagnosis of vertebral metastasis / Diagnóstico por imagen de las metástasis vertebrales

La columna vertebral es la tercera ubicación más frecuente para la enfermedad metastásica, después del pulmón y el hígado. Por otra parte, los tumores óseos más recurrentes son las metástasis, siendo la columna su principal lugar de localización. En este trabajo se realiza una revisión de las diferentes técnicas de imagen disponibles, tanto radiológicas como de medicina nuclear, y de la apariencia morfológica de las metástasis de columna en cada una de ellas. La resonancia magnética (RM) es la mejor modalidad de imagen para la detección de metástasis en la columna. Es importante efectuar el diagnóstico diferencial entre fractura vertebral de causa osteoporótica y patológica. La compresión medular es una complicación grave de la enfermedad metastásica y su valoración mediante imagen a través de escalas objetivas es determinante para la estimación de la estabilidad de la columna y, por consiguiente, para establecer el tratamiento. Por último, se comentan brevemente las técnicas de intervencionismo percutáneo.(AU)

The spine is the third most frequent location for metastatic disease, after the lung and liver. On the other hand, the most frequent bone tumors are metastases and the spine is the main location. A review of the different imaging techniques available, both radiological and nuclear medicine, and the morphological appearance of spinal metastases in each of them is performed. Magnetic resonance imaging is the best imaging modality for detection of spinal metastases. It is important to make the differential diagnosis between vertebral fracture of osteoporotic and pathological cause. Spinal cord compression is a serious complication of metastatic disease and its assessment by imaging through objective scales is decisive for estimating spinal stability and therefore establishing treatment. Lastly, percutaneous intervention techniques are briefly discussed.(AU)

[Artículo traducido] Manejo de metástasis sintomáticas de columna: un enfoque multidisciplinario basado en un diagrama de flujo / Management of symptomatic spine metastases: A multidisciplinary approach based flow-chart

Describimos un algoritmo para el manejo de las metástasis espinales en el que la importancia de los parámetros individuales varía dependiendo del momento en el que se contemplan.Cada paciente sigue su propio proceso secuencial «personal» que no necesariamente considera todos los parámetros cada vez, ya que algunos pueden ser irrelevantes a la hora de elegir el tipo de tratamiento para ese individuo. Por ejemplo, un paciente en mal estado general con una puntuación ASA alta generalmente no es candidato para la cirugía, independientemente de la naturaleza del tumor primario o del número de metástasis. Para este paciente, el elemento más importante sería la sensibilidad del tumor al tratamiento adyuvante. Del mismo modo, un paciente con lesión aguda y progresiva de la médula espinal se sometería a descompresión quirúrgica y estabilización sin considerar una intervención más agresiva.(AU)

We described an algorithm for the management of spinal metastases in which the importance of single parameters varies depending on when they are contemplated.Each patient follows his own «personal» sequential process which does not necessarily consider all the parameters each time as some may be irrelevant for the purpose of choosing the type of treatment for that single individual. For instance, a patient in general poor condition with a high ASA score is usually not a candidate for surgery, regardless of the primary tumor nature or the number of metastases. For this patient, the most important element would be the sensitivity of the tumor to adjuvant treatment. Similarly, a patient with acute and progressive spinal cord injury would undergo surgical decompression and stabilization without considering a more strenuous intervention.(AU)

Management of symptomatic spine metastases: A multidisciplinary approach based flow-chart / Manejo de metástasis sintomáticas de columna: un enfoque multidisciplinario basado en un diagrama de flujo

Describimos un algoritmo para el manejo de las metástasis espinales en el que la importancia de los parámetros individuales varía dependiendo del momento en el que se contemplan.Cada paciente sigue su propio proceso secuencial «personal» que no necesariamente considera todos los parámetros cada vez, ya que algunos pueden ser irrelevantes a la hora de elegir el tipo de tratamiento para ese individuo. Por ejemplo, un paciente en mal estado general con una puntuación ASA alta generalmente no es candidato para la cirugía, independientemente de la naturaleza del tumor primario o del número de metástasis. Para este paciente, el elemento más importante sería la sensibilidad del tumor al tratamiento adyuvante. Del mismo modo, un paciente con lesión aguda y progresiva de la médula espinal se sometería a descompresión quirúrgica y estabilización sin considerar una intervención más agresiva.(AU)

We described an algorithm for the management of spinal metastases in which the importance of single parameters varies depending on when they are contemplated.Each patient follows his own «personal» sequential process which does not necessarily consider all the parameters each time as some may be irrelevant for the purpose of choosing the type of treatment for that single individual. For instance, a patient in general poor condition with a high ASA score is usually not a candidate for surgery, regardless of the primary tumor nature or the number of metastases. For this patient, the most important element would be the sensitivity of the tumor to adjuvant treatment. Similarly, a patient with acute and progressive spinal cord injury would undergo surgical decompression and stabilization without considering a more strenuous intervention.(AU)